Thanks a lot. Yes, after some testing, I've discovered that they're not the same.
In fact, TriX 400 on 35mm processed as reversal is a very problematic stock.
Search found 4 matches
- Fri Dec 30, 2016 8:50 am
- Forum: Black and White Transparency Processing
- Topic: Tri-X
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8485
- Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:14 am
- Forum: Black and White Transparency Processing
- Topic: D11 at wrong dilution
- Replies: 6
- Views: 24103
D11 at wrong dilution
In the third edition of the book, David wood recommends the use of D11 as first developer for reversal, but in a 1:3 dilution during 12-15'. This has been widely discussed at APUG and other places, because this dilution doesn't work and almost everybody thought it was a typo. At the fourth edition, ...
- Tue Oct 04, 2016 5:04 am
- Forum: Black and White Transparency Processing
- Topic: Tri-X
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8485
Tri-X
Thanks!
Yes, indeed. But as I'm testing several films, I just wanted to gain some time.
Yes, indeed. But as I'm testing several films, I just wanted to gain some time.
- Mon Oct 03, 2016 5:57 pm
- Forum: Black and White Transparency Processing
- Topic: Tri-X
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8485
Tri-X
Hi! I'm the first posting here...
Anybody knows if Tri-X Super-8 is exactly the same film as Kodak TX400? I would like to experiment processing the 35mm in reversal before attempting a Super-8 reel...
Thanks!
Anybody knows if Tri-X Super-8 is exactly the same film as Kodak TX400? I would like to experiment processing the 35mm in reversal before attempting a Super-8 reel...
Thanks!